The Florida Supreme Court on Friday agreed to take up a legal battle about a voter-approved change that called for Orange County constitutional officers to be chosen in non-partisan elections.

Justices issued a brief order accepting the case, though they did not immediately set a date for oral arguments.

Orange County voters in 2014 supported revamping the county charter to include non-partisan elections for the clerk of circuit court, comptroller, property appraiser, sheriff, supervisor of elections and tax collector.

Constitutional officers filed a lawsuit, and a circuit judge rejected the change, concluding that the issue was “preempted” to the Legislature.

A three-judge panel of the 5th District Court of Appeal in December upheld the circuit judge’s ruling, leading the county to take the issue to the Supreme Court.

In a brief filed in January, the county said the case could also have implications for other parts of the state.

“The issue of whether the voters in Orange County can adopt a charter amendment which designates the selection of county constitutional officers by way of nonpartisan election is an issue of statewide importance. … The decision of the Fifth District infringes upon the broad home rule authority provided to counties under the Florida Constitution … and has the potential to jeopardize the enforceability of charter provisions in other charter counties,” the brief said.

“For example, the counties of Columbia, Lee, Leon, Orange, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, Polk, and Wakulla are examples of charter counties across the state which have adopted charter provisions providing for the election of one or more governmental officials on a nonpartisan basis, which this decision has a potential to impact.”

About The Author

The News Service of Florida provides journalists, lobbyists, government officials and other civic leaders with comprehensive, objective information about the activities of state government year-round.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.